Comments on: Sennheiser Evolution G2 100 Wireless Mic for Video Review

By: JR

JR — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:25:50 +0000

Nevermind, After re-reading your post I see you meant $300 less than G3 not $300 for the kit.

By: JR

JR — Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:23:49 +0000

In your december 14th post on the Sennheiser Evolution G2 100′s you say you found them for about $300 can you share where you got them at that price?
” I knew that basically I was buying the older model since the Evolution G3 was out. However, since the G2 was going for about $300 less, I went for it.”

By: Max Simbron

Max Simbron — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:37:10 +0000

Terry,

I own and use a pair of the original Evolution series, as well as a G2 set. For the money, they are solidly built and very well made. FYI, if the fine tuning on the audio is too problematic, you can set levels (on the transmitter) and input (on the receiver) for the kit. I find this to be a good way to fine tine audio when the camera’s own system is too coarse.

Thanks for the heads up on the G3, I may have to scope out the differences and get a kit.

Max

By: Terry White

Terry White — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:45:02 +0000

Jan,
thanks and corrected to say: “As matter of fact (rule) you can’t have good video without good audio”

By: Jan Winther

Jan Winther — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:05:47 +0000

I totally agree with Shoshana. A bad sound on a video clip just makes me close it and move on.

This caught my eye though.

“As a matter of fact (rule) you can have good video without good audio.”

… dont you mean you can good audio without good video?

Jan

By: Shoshana Kleiman

Shoshana Kleiman — Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:05:07 +0000

The eye can forgive much. The ear can’t. Good audio is very important. Thanks for this post. I’ll be looking for this product.