<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D5000 &#8211; A different kind of review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570</link>
	<description>Welcome to my technology blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:26:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aleksandar Panov</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-19568</link>
		<dc:creator>Aleksandar Panov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-19568</guid>
		<description>Hi Jay,

You said:
&quot;For editing, 1) I take the footage into Premier and remove the annoying stair step pattern with this method. http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=168166&quot;
I don&#039;t see any method there. Just some script developement announcement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jay,</p>
<p>You said:<br />
&#8220;For editing, 1) I take the footage into Premier and remove the annoying stair step pattern with this method. <a href="http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=168166" rel="nofollow">http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?t=168166</a>&#8221;<br />
I don&#8217;t see any method there. Just some script developement announcement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My recent trip to Europe: What worked and what didn’t? &#124; The Iphone Blog</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-18870</link>
		<dc:creator>My recent trip to Europe: What worked and what didn’t? &#124; The Iphone Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-18870</guid>
		<description>[...] any pieces of technology that totally failed me. Of course I took my MacBook Pro, my iPhone 3GS, my Nikon D5000 DSLR, my Kodak Zi8 HD Video camera, &#160;a multitude of cables and accessories as well as the necessary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any pieces of technology that totally failed me. Of course I took my MacBook Pro, my iPhone 3GS, my Nikon D5000 DSLR, my Kodak Zi8 HD Video camera, &nbsp;a multitude of cables and accessories as well as the necessary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis J</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-18539</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-18539</guid>
		<description>Hey Terry,

Thank you very much for the info! It was very useful as I had problems with the video from my D5000 playing back in Premeire CS4 and Handbrake/Quicktime Pro seems to be a good solution. What project setting in Premiere Pro do you use? I used the 24p progressive and it does not want to register...I will check out the actually settings and try the conversion stuff later tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Terry,</p>
<p>Thank you very much for the info! It was very useful as I had problems with the video from my D5000 playing back in Premeire CS4 and Handbrake/Quicktime Pro seems to be a good solution. What project setting in Premiere Pro do you use? I used the 24p progressive and it does not want to register&#8230;I will check out the actually settings and try the conversion stuff later tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W Wong</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-16945</link>
		<dc:creator>W Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-16945</guid>
		<description>Hi,
After I read numerous comments and photo sample of D5000, I bought one a week ago in the hope of higher ISO, say 1600, in order to freeze kid&#039;s action in door (night).  Well, seems I was wrong coz the picture quality is quite poor (red/green patches) and looks dark ( i at least set EV +1.0 or +1.3)  not like all the reviews I saw.  I even shoot RAW and use in camera post processing to push EV.  Any advise for me.  I have been using D200 for 2 years and before I purchase the D5000, looks to me it has a much better ISO performance than my D200.
Thks in advance for any tips or advise.
Cheers,

(Pls excuse for my English)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
After I read numerous comments and photo sample of D5000, I bought one a week ago in the hope of higher ISO, say 1600, in order to freeze kid&#8217;s action in door (night).  Well, seems I was wrong coz the picture quality is quite poor (red/green patches) and looks dark ( i at least set EV +1.0 or +1.3)  not like all the reviews I saw.  I even shoot RAW and use in camera post processing to push EV.  Any advise for me.  I have been using D200 for 2 years and before I purchase the D5000, looks to me it has a much better ISO performance than my D200.<br />
Thks in advance for any tips or advise.<br />
Cheers,</p>
<p>(Pls excuse for my English)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: convert mts</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-16806</link>
		<dc:creator>convert mts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 08:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-16806</guid>
		<description>handbrake.fr is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>handbrake.fr is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mere D5000 &#171; Jesper Skærbæk Jensen Fotoblog</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-16760</link>
		<dc:creator>Mere D5000 &#171; Jesper Skærbæk Jensen Fotoblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-16760</guid>
		<description>[...] Mere&#160;D5000 30. juni 2009 Gemt under: Foto generelt &#8212; jsjphoto @ 15:32    Jeg faldt over Terry White&#8217;s blog idag. Han har lavet en lidt anderledes anmeldelse af Nikon D5000. Som han siger, så har stort set alle anmeldelser indtil nu, fokuseret ca 95% på fotodelen, og højst 5% på det faktum, at D5000 kan optage video. Han har derfor valgt, at kigge lidt på videodelen. Det kan du læse om her [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mere&nbsp;D5000 30. juni 2009 Gemt under: Foto generelt &#8212; jsjphoto @ 15:32    Jeg faldt over Terry White&#8217;s blog idag. Han har lavet en lidt anderledes anmeldelse af Nikon D5000. Som han siger, så har stort set alle anmeldelser indtil nu, fokuseret ca 95% på fotodelen, og højst 5% på det faktum, at D5000 kan optage video. Han har derfor valgt, at kigge lidt på videodelen. Det kan du læse om her [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Alberto Zayas</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14755</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Alberto Zayas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14755</guid>
		<description>Do you think it is equal or better than the noise from the D300?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think it is equal or better than the noise from the D300?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry White</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14754</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14754</guid>
		<description>Hard to say since I never owned a D200. However, the noise is good!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to say since I never owned a D200. However, the noise is good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Alberto Zayas</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14752</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Alberto Zayas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14752</guid>
		<description>Hi Terry,

I have both a D300 and a D200. I am planning to sell the D200 to be able to by the D5000. Do you think the image quality (noise, etc.) of the D5000 is better than that of the D200? I would also like to have the video capabillity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry,</p>
<p>I have both a D300 and a D200. I am planning to sell the D200 to be able to by the D5000. Do you think the image quality (noise, etc.) of the D5000 is better than that of the D200? I would also like to have the video capabillity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14437</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14437</guid>
		<description>iso is in automode(exif count @ 2500),i shoot at jpg.

previously i own a D60 i adjust only the setup to more vivid in order to get a sharper photo but in my d5000 i have difficulty getting a more vivid photos. what is the best setup on order to get a more vivid photo?(adjustment for saturation,hue,etc)

thanks in advance terry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iso is in automode(exif count @ 2500),i shoot at jpg.</p>
<p>previously i own a D60 i adjust only the setup to more vivid in order to get a sharper photo but in my d5000 i have difficulty getting a more vivid photos. what is the best setup on order to get a more vivid photo?(adjustment for saturation,hue,etc)</p>
<p>thanks in advance terry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry White</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14436</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14436</guid>
		<description>What was your ISO set at? The higher the ISO the more grain you&#039;re likely to see. Also were you shooting JPEG or RAW? JPEG will also have more grain than RAW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was your ISO set at? The higher the ISO the more grain you&#8217;re likely to see. Also were you shooting JPEG or RAW? JPEG will also have more grain than RAW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14431</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14431</guid>
		<description>Hi Terry

I recently bought a D5000, presently my main problem when i took photos a night in our garage the photos are clear in the lcd but when i download to my laptop the photos appear with some grain.

please help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry</p>
<p>I recently bought a D5000, presently my main problem when i took photos a night in our garage the photos are clear in the lcd but when i download to my laptop the photos appear with some grain.</p>
<p>please help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon D5000 Reviews: Digital Photography Notes</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14280</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon D5000 Reviews: Digital Photography Notes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 15:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14280</guid>
		<description>[...] Terry White on the Nikon D5000 - Great write-up by Terry, covering areas such as how to edit the video clips, the image quality of the D5000, and using GPS geotagging with the camera. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Terry White on the Nikon D5000 &#8211; Great write-up by Terry, covering areas such as how to edit the video clips, the image quality of the D5000, and using GPS geotagging with the camera. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg D</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14045</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14045</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why anyone would choose this camera over a D90 as a backup camera.

The D5000 won&#039;t autofocus with Nikon &quot;D&quot; lenses (such as the Nikon 85mm you mention in your review).
The D90 has a larger, higher definition screen than the D5000.
The D5000 uses different batteries than the higher end cameras (such as the D700) - the D90 uses the same batteries.
I believe the D90 has a few other pluses over the D5000.
I almost like the flip screen on the D5000, except that it flips down and can&#039;t be used for &quot;selfie&quot; kinds of shots.

Those differences in my opinion easily justify the less than $300 street price difference between the D90 and the D5000 (it is interesting that Nikon raised the D90 price when they brought out the D5000).

I could imagine someone on a very limited budget choosing the D5000, but if I were in that boat, I&#039;d go for a refurbished D90.

Just my two cents - I have a D700, and D300 and an D90.  I continue to use the D300 most of the time - it is better for bird photography (IMHO) than the other two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why anyone would choose this camera over a D90 as a backup camera.</p>
<p>The D5000 won&#8217;t autofocus with Nikon &#8220;D&#8221; lenses (such as the Nikon 85mm you mention in your review).<br />
The D90 has a larger, higher definition screen than the D5000.<br />
The D5000 uses different batteries than the higher end cameras (such as the D700) &#8211; the D90 uses the same batteries.<br />
I believe the D90 has a few other pluses over the D5000.<br />
I almost like the flip screen on the D5000, except that it flips down and can&#8217;t be used for &#8220;selfie&#8221; kinds of shots.</p>
<p>Those differences in my opinion easily justify the less than $300 street price difference between the D90 and the D5000 (it is interesting that Nikon raised the D90 price when they brought out the D5000).</p>
<p>I could imagine someone on a very limited budget choosing the D5000, but if I were in that boat, I&#8217;d go for a refurbished D90.</p>
<p>Just my two cents &#8211; I have a D700, and D300 and an D90.  I continue to use the D300 most of the time &#8211; it is better for bird photography (IMHO) than the other two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NikonRumors.com Admin</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/2570#comment-14038</link>
		<dc:creator>NikonRumors.com Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=2570#comment-14038</guid>
		<description>Hi Terry, I labeled my post as &quot;Coincidence&quot; and I mentioned that it probably was a coincidence, but still an interesting one. Now, if Joe McNally also sells his D300 I will change my mind :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Terry, I labeled my post as &#8220;Coincidence&#8221; and I mentioned that it probably was a coincidence, but still an interesting one. Now, if Joe McNally also sells his D300 I will change my mind <img src='http://terrywhite.com/techblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

