<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fujitsu ScanSnap S300M Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121</link>
	<description>Welcome to my technology blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:41:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Wiens</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-19274</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Wiens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-19274</guid>
		<description>As far as I can tell, you cannot run the scan snap software and quicken at the same time.  If quicken is running while you run scansnap, you cannot enter the folder and file name into scansnap for document storage (I&#039;m not trying to store a document in quicken - just a folder).  It is the strangest thing - you can actually enter the file name, but for some reason scan snap interprets it as being full of special characters and rejects it.  Kill quicken and it works fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can tell, you cannot run the scan snap software and quicken at the same time.  If quicken is running while you run scansnap, you cannot enter the folder and file name into scansnap for document storage (I&#8217;m not trying to store a document in quicken &#8211; just a folder).  It is the strangest thing &#8211; you can actually enter the file name, but for some reason scan snap interprets it as being full of special characters and rejects it.  Kill quicken and it works fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodie Quirk</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-19252</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodie Quirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-19252</guid>
		<description>sorry &quot;not 20-25mb&quot; should read &quot;now 20-25mb&quot;. I need to learn to proofread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry &#8220;not 20-25mb&#8221; should read &#8220;now 20-25mb&#8221;. I need to learn to proofread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodie Quirk</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-19251</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodie Quirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-19251</guid>
		<description>Terry, 

Thanks for the reply. If you don&#039;t mind an extension to my question, I could use your help on something.

My eventual goal in all this is to get everything on the iPad, which means ePub, of course.
The S300M doesn&#039;t come with OCR software, so I have been doing the OCR in Acrobat. When I scan a text document into Acrobat on the highest compression setting in the ScanSnap software, a 50pg document comes in to Acrobat and it is about 3-4mb. However, when I run OCR on it, that document is not 20-25mb! When I run the Reduce File Size command, it shaves off only 1-2mb. Why are these so large?

Since I am not going to keep these anyways, I wanted to see if you would recommend copy/pasting the  OCR&#039;d text into InDesign and doing an ePub output (something I now know what to do thanks to you) or use Calibre to just convert the pdf to ePub.

Thanks again for all your help

Bodie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, </p>
<p>Thanks for the reply. If you don&#8217;t mind an extension to my question, I could use your help on something.</p>
<p>My eventual goal in all this is to get everything on the iPad, which means ePub, of course.<br />
The S300M doesn&#8217;t come with OCR software, so I have been doing the OCR in Acrobat. When I scan a text document into Acrobat on the highest compression setting in the ScanSnap software, a 50pg document comes in to Acrobat and it is about 3-4mb. However, when I run OCR on it, that document is not 20-25mb! When I run the Reduce File Size command, it shaves off only 1-2mb. Why are these so large?</p>
<p>Since I am not going to keep these anyways, I wanted to see if you would recommend copy/pasting the  OCR&#8217;d text into InDesign and doing an ePub output (something I now know what to do thanks to you) or use Calibre to just convert the pdf to ePub.</p>
<p>Thanks again for all your help</p>
<p>Bodie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrywhite</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-19197</link>
		<dc:creator>terrywhite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-19197</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m traveling so I can&#039;t check my settings. Typically I have used the ABBY Reader software that&#039;s available for the snapscan to do the OCR during the scanning process. However, I don&#039;t think that it&#039;s included with the S300 model (can&#039;t remember). So in that case yes, I would use Acrobat to run OCR and Reduce File Size at the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m traveling so I can&#8217;t check my settings. Typically I have used the ABBY Reader software that&#8217;s available for the snapscan to do the OCR during the scanning process. However, I don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s included with the S300 model (can&#8217;t remember). So in that case yes, I would use Acrobat to run OCR and Reduce File Size at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodie Quirk</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-19194</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodie Quirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-19194</guid>
		<description>Terry,

Thank you for your review and recommendation of the ScanSnap S300M, I just got mine!! I am going to be using it for a large document scanning process and I wanted to know if you could share with me your best practices with scanning and Acrobat. Here are some questions I have:

1) What compression setting would you use for text documents? I used 4 out of 5 on compression.
2) After scanning, Acrobat opens. What then? Run OCR? Optimize PDF? Reduce File Size?

Love some tips on how you keep file sizes down, and quality up, as well as having all the goodies like OCR. 

Continually thankful for you!

Bodie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry,</p>
<p>Thank you for your review and recommendation of the ScanSnap S300M, I just got mine!! I am going to be using it for a large document scanning process and I wanted to know if you could share with me your best practices with scanning and Acrobat. Here are some questions I have:</p>
<p>1) What compression setting would you use for text documents? I used 4 out of 5 on compression.<br />
2) After scanning, Acrobat opens. What then? Run OCR? Optimize PDF? Reduce File Size?</p>
<p>Love some tips on how you keep file sizes down, and quality up, as well as having all the goodies like OCR. </p>
<p>Continually thankful for you!</p>
<p>Bodie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-15935</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-15935</guid>
		<description>I bought a Fuji S1500, and it works with scansnap for both mac and pc. However, it does not seem to work with neatworks for pc (I do not own neatworks for mac so I couldn&#039;t test it). 
Unfortunately, I don&#039;t think the s1500 will work with neatworks for pc since they want you to buy their scanner :(

btw... what&#039;s with trying to prevent people from using hardware they paid for? Let us buy the machine once and use it for whatever computers we have!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a Fuji S1500, and it works with scansnap for both mac and pc. However, it does not seem to work with neatworks for pc (I do not own neatworks for mac so I couldn&#8217;t test it).<br />
Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t think the s1500 will work with neatworks for pc since they want you to buy their scanner <img src='http://terrywhite.com/techblog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>btw&#8230; what&#8217;s with trying to prevent people from using hardware they paid for? Let us buy the machine once and use it for whatever computers we have!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harringg</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-15427</link>
		<dc:creator>harringg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-15427</guid>
		<description>@SlowFuji

I tried connecting the S300M to an XP and it won&#039;t work.  Fuji&#039;s tech support says it&#039;s not possible to use the &quot;M&quot; on a Windows machine.   Have you had any luck with the other driver?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SlowFuji</p>
<p>I tried connecting the S300M to an XP and it won&#8217;t work.  Fuji&#8217;s tech support says it&#8217;s not possible to use the &#8220;M&#8221; on a Windows machine.   Have you had any luck with the other driver?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-15110</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-15110</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using NeatDesk with my S300M for a month now and it&#039;s brilliant.  One-step scan and OCR with an iTunes-like interface for organizing all your searchable pdf&#039;s. My only complaint with the program is that your pdf is saved as a Neatdesk document.  It&#039;s still a pdf but it&#039;s saved within the architecture of the program. If you want to export as a standalone pdf you can do it, but it&#039;s an extra step I don&#039;t want to take.   I was able to download the program for a sizable discount by googling Neatdesk Promo Code!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using NeatDesk with my S300M for a month now and it&#8217;s brilliant.  One-step scan and OCR with an iTunes-like interface for organizing all your searchable pdf&#8217;s. My only complaint with the program is that your pdf is saved as a Neatdesk document.  It&#8217;s still a pdf but it&#8217;s saved within the architecture of the program. If you want to export as a standalone pdf you can do it, but it&#8217;s an extra step I don&#8217;t want to take.   I was able to download the program for a sizable discount by googling Neatdesk Promo Code!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-14294</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-14294</guid>
		<description>Any impressions of the NeatDesk product?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any impressions of the NeatDesk product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlowFuji</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-14105</link>
		<dc:creator>SlowFuji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-14105</guid>
		<description>Moderator can you please add to the above comment:

Please note that we haven&#039;t tried the S1500M on XP/Vista/Win7 because the M version supposedly doesn&#039;t work on that platform although I&#039;ve read about people downloading the Japanese drivers off Fujitsu&#039;s site to make it work on XP. AFAIK the only real difference between the Mac and PC version is that the Mac version of the S1500 is white and the PC version is white. We haven&#039;t tried popping in the CD into a Windows machine to see if the drivers for Windows Xp/Vista are included. They just might be. Just wanted to include that for completeness sake. I hope you people OCR&#039;ing  on the XP side are experiencing faster performance. I&#039;ve read about law offices using this scanner for their thousand page files that are happy with it but I seriously doubt they&#039;re OCRing their PDF&#039;s to make them text-searchable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moderator can you please add to the above comment:</p>
<p>Please note that we haven&#8217;t tried the S1500M on XP/Vista/Win7 because the M version supposedly doesn&#8217;t work on that platform although I&#8217;ve read about people downloading the Japanese drivers off Fujitsu&#8217;s site to make it work on XP. AFAIK the only real difference between the Mac and PC version is that the Mac version of the S1500 is white and the PC version is white. We haven&#8217;t tried popping in the CD into a Windows machine to see if the drivers for Windows Xp/Vista are included. They just might be. Just wanted to include that for completeness sake. I hope you people OCR&#8217;ing  on the XP side are experiencing faster performance. I&#8217;ve read about law offices using this scanner for their thousand page files that are happy with it but I seriously doubt they&#8217;re OCRing their PDF&#8217;s to make them text-searchable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlowFuji</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-14104</link>
		<dc:creator>SlowFuji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-14104</guid>
		<description>I have several Canon multifunction all-in-ones that I use in OSX and XP. They are multi-sheet-feed scanners that scan slowly. When I save the PDF file, the Canon OCR is lightning-fast and seems to happen as the document is being saved, wether it is single page PDF or multipage PDF. I always run the OCR portion because it makes typed documents so easy to find in OS X (and probably Vista and Win7) because OS X will scan inside each document for the text you&#039;re trying to find.

I got the ScanSnap S1500M (no clue why they make Mac vs. PC versions of the same hardware) and it scans really fast but has a few glaring flaws. 1) The OCR is HORRIBLY slow. It is so slow that I&#039;m pretty sure that if I timed the slow-scanning, fast OCRing Canon vs. the fast-scanning, slow OCRing Fujitsu, it would probably be a draw. I&#039;ve tried this on slow and fast machines with gobs of RAM. 2) The rubber rollers on the Fujitsu bend the page ever so slightly so that when you look at your resultant scanned PDF page, you notice 2 rows of little bends on your documents. It&#039;s especially noticeable when there are squares in the documents. We considered running the OCR after hours but it&#039;s not reliable and doesn&#039;t fit into our workflow.

In all instances, we&#039;re using the default software with optimised settings. 200DPI, black&amp;white. We are a medical office and we scan and shred completed documents that are signed. Our requirements are 1)that the document be searchable and 2) when printing the document (i.e. to send to insurance, etc) that it is nearly as legible as the original.

On the Fujitsu we are not using the included Acrobat 8 (weird since 9 has been out) because we want as few steps as possible for the staff.

Anyway, we&#039;re dissapointed in the overall speed of the Fujitsu because the end result is it takes the same amount of time from start to finish for a particular document. It would be fine if we didn&#039;t run OCR and just saved the PDF as essentially a file of multi-page images. It&#039;s amazing that a $100 (free with rebate) Canon MFP can OCR so fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have several Canon multifunction all-in-ones that I use in OSX and XP. They are multi-sheet-feed scanners that scan slowly. When I save the PDF file, the Canon OCR is lightning-fast and seems to happen as the document is being saved, wether it is single page PDF or multipage PDF. I always run the OCR portion because it makes typed documents so easy to find in OS X (and probably Vista and Win7) because OS X will scan inside each document for the text you&#8217;re trying to find.</p>
<p>I got the ScanSnap S1500M (no clue why they make Mac vs. PC versions of the same hardware) and it scans really fast but has a few glaring flaws. 1) The OCR is HORRIBLY slow. It is so slow that I&#8217;m pretty sure that if I timed the slow-scanning, fast OCRing Canon vs. the fast-scanning, slow OCRing Fujitsu, it would probably be a draw. I&#8217;ve tried this on slow and fast machines with gobs of RAM. 2) The rubber rollers on the Fujitsu bend the page ever so slightly so that when you look at your resultant scanned PDF page, you notice 2 rows of little bends on your documents. It&#8217;s especially noticeable when there are squares in the documents. We considered running the OCR after hours but it&#8217;s not reliable and doesn&#8217;t fit into our workflow.</p>
<p>In all instances, we&#8217;re using the default software with optimised settings. 200DPI, black&amp;white. We are a medical office and we scan and shred completed documents that are signed. Our requirements are 1)that the document be searchable and 2) when printing the document (i.e. to send to insurance, etc) that it is nearly as legible as the original.</p>
<p>On the Fujitsu we are not using the included Acrobat 8 (weird since 9 has been out) because we want as few steps as possible for the staff.</p>
<p>Anyway, we&#8217;re dissapointed in the overall speed of the Fujitsu because the end result is it takes the same amount of time from start to finish for a particular document. It would be fine if we didn&#8217;t run OCR and just saved the PDF as essentially a file of multi-page images. It&#8217;s amazing that a $100 (free with rebate) Canon MFP can OCR so fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harringg</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-13744</link>
		<dc:creator>harringg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-13744</guid>
		<description>@Danny

Yes, as far as I can tell, Read Iris will do OCR for you.  Looks like a great deal if you don&#039;t have OCR software.  I&#039;m getting the free case they are offering since I have DTPO which will do OCR for me.  I&#039;ve started using my S300M and it&#039;s speed is perfect for my needs.  Again, it was Terry&#039;s review that sold me on it.  I love it&#039;s small footprint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Danny</p>
<p>Yes, as far as I can tell, Read Iris will do OCR for you.  Looks like a great deal if you don&#8217;t have OCR software.  I&#8217;m getting the free case they are offering since I have DTPO which will do OCR for me.  I&#8217;ve started using my S300M and it&#8217;s speed is perfect for my needs.  Again, it was Terry&#8217;s review that sold me on it.  I love it&#8217;s small footprint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-13697</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-13697</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information.  If I&#039;m going to scan all my docs I want to be able to index them with spotlight to find them easily.  The 510 seems to do it all in one button push. Fujitsu is offering a free copy of ReadIris with the S300M now.  Will that give the scanner the ability to create searchable pdf&#039;s just like the 510?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information.  If I&#8217;m going to scan all my docs I want to be able to index them with spotlight to find them easily.  The 510 seems to do it all in one button push. Fujitsu is offering a free copy of ReadIris with the S300M now.  Will that give the scanner the ability to create searchable pdf&#8217;s just like the 510?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Treebark</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-13674</link>
		<dc:creator>Treebark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-13674</guid>
		<description>Terry and others...

Just a heads up you can get the neat receipts software by itself (mac or PC) and it works with the Fujitsu scanners. 

http://www.neatco.com/support/downloads/mac-hardware/

I actually came here trying to decide on the S300M or the neatco scanner. The latter has the size I want, but not the speed. grrrrrrrrr.

Hopefully I can get the end results to evernote!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry and others&#8230;</p>
<p>Just a heads up you can get the neat receipts software by itself (mac or PC) and it works with the Fujitsu scanners. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.neatco.com/support/downloads/mac-hardware/" rel="nofollow">http://www.neatco.com/support/downloads/mac-hardware/</a></p>
<p>I actually came here trying to decide on the S300M or the neatco scanner. The latter has the size I want, but not the speed. grrrrrrrrr.</p>
<p>Hopefully I can get the end results to evernote!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harringg</title>
		<link>http://terrywhite.com/techblog/archives/1121#comment-13594</link>
		<dc:creator>harringg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://terrywhite.com/techblog/?p=1121#comment-13594</guid>
		<description>Great review Terry!  I&#039;m looking at getting a document scanner for DevonThinkPro Office and you sold me on the S300M.  That speed is just fine for my small businesses volume of paperwork I&#039;d import.  The video cinched it, to read &quot;It’s not as fast as the S510M&quot; is one thing, so see the speed in a real world is another.  That speed is not an issue for me with the S300M, it&#039;s clearly leaps and bounds faster than my current workflow with a flat bed scanner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review Terry!  I&#8217;m looking at getting a document scanner for DevonThinkPro Office and you sold me on the S300M.  That speed is just fine for my small businesses volume of paperwork I&#8217;d import.  The video cinched it, to read &#8220;It’s not as fast as the S510M&#8221; is one thing, so see the speed in a real world is another.  That speed is not an issue for me with the S300M, it&#8217;s clearly leaps and bounds faster than my current workflow with a flat bed scanner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

